Manager–Employee Communication in the #MeToo Era: The Role of Gender Similarity and Context Ambiguity in Ethical Leadership

Authors

  • Lindsey Meeks University of Oklahoma
  • William T. Howe University of Oklahoma

Keywords:

ethical leadership, feminist standpoint theory, sexual harassment, workplace harassment

Abstract

Sexual harassment is a widespread problem in the American workplace. Managers must understand how their employees perceive ethical leadership in this context. This includes current undergraduates—managers’ future employees. Undergraduates are entering the workforce in a climate of heightened awareness due to the #MeToo movement and federally required collegiate sexual violence training. Grounded in scholarship on ethical leadership and feminist standpoint theory, the experiment compares U.S. undergraduates’ perceptions of male and female managers across common workplace scenarios and examines their evaluations of managers’ traits and behaviors. Analysis reveals (a) what manager behavior is deemed ethical, (b) a general preference for female managers, and (c) that women evaluate female managers more positively than male managers. This study’s findings provide important implications for employee–manager communicative exchanges.

Author Biographies

Lindsey Meeks, University of Oklahoma

Lindsey Meeks is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Oklahoma. Her research interests include political communication, gender, and media.

William T. Howe, University of Oklahoma

William is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication with a focus on organizational communication and a specific interest in high reliability organizations. William earned both his Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from Texas Christian University in communication studies.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-13

Issue

Section

Articles