Political Issues Management: Framing the Issue of Climate Change

Authors

  • Meaghan McKasy Utah Valley University
  • Diana Zulli Purdue University

Keywords:

political issues management, public relations, framing, climate change, primary campaigns

Abstract

Politicians must identify and present issues in ways that resonate with the public, effectively establishing their legitimacy as issue managers. This public relations concept has primarily been studied in the corporate context. By bridging public relations and political communication scholarship, this analysis examines how democratic presidential candidates at CNN’s 2019 climate crisis town hall managed the issue of climate change using fact versus value-based frames, gain/loss frames, and responsibility frames. The results indicate that candidates predominantly used value-based frames, gains were almost exclusively presented in the context of the economy, and candidates were more likely to use prognostic frames over diagnostic responsibility frames when presenting the issue to the public. These findings speak to the value of framing in political issues management.

Author Biographies

Meaghan McKasy, Utah Valley University

Meaghan McKasy (Ph.D., University of Utah) is an Assistant Professor of Public Relations in the Department of Communication at Utah Valley University. Her research examines information processing and attitude formation in science and environmental communication.

Diana Zulli, Purdue University

Diana Zulli (Ph.D., University of Utah) is an Assistant Professor of Public Relations and Political Communication in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University. Her research interests include communication theory, political discourse, and digital technology.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles