“Trust, Then Verify”: When and Why People Fact-Check Partisan Information

Authors

  • Nathan Walter Northwestern University
  • Stephanie Edgerly Northwestern University
  • Camille J. Saucier Northwestern University

Keywords:

fact-checking, credibility, motivated reasoning, uncertainty, perceived accuracy

Abstract

Using two experiments, the present studies examine the motivations (accuracy goals versus directional goals) underlying verification intentions and fact-checking. Study 1 explores the role of news article uncertainty and ideological congruence in motivating individuals to fact-check, proposing a mediation model that involves perceptions of speaker credibility and message accuracy. Study 2 complements these findings and tests the ability to reduce ideological bias by providing readers with a forewarning “note from the editor” regarding the partisan nature of the article. The findings point to the importance of considering the motivations for fact-checking and the need to distinguish between “affirming fact-checkers” and “informing fact-checkers.” 

Author Biographies

Nathan Walter, Northwestern University

Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Studies 

Stephanie Edgerly, Northwestern University

Associate Professor, Medill School of Journalism

Camille J. Saucier, Northwestern University

Ph.D. student, Department of Communication Studies

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles