A Trade War With or Without Trump: Actual Topical Knowledge as a Moderator of Question Wording Effect on Survey Responses

Authors

  • Gabriel Miao Li University of Michigan
  • Jack Lipei Tang University of Southern California

Keywords:

question wording, political knowledge, survey experiment, issue framing, partisanship, foreign policy attitude

Abstract

It is a platitude of communication and public opinion research that responses to survey questions to a great extent depend on the words used in those questions. This idea, however, was not always well supported in empirical studies. We argue that the inconsistent findings from prior research might stem from the fact that different groups of individuals have varying sensitivity to the influences of question wording variations. With an online survey experiment testing participants’ attitudes toward the foreign trade disputes under the Trump administration, we found that the impact of changes in question wording on inducing different responses was moderated by participants’ actual topical knowledge. Referring to the issue as “Trump’s trade war” significantly reduced its favorability compared to describing it as “the trade war” without mentioning Trump, but only among participants who were unknowledgeable about tariffs and international trade issues. The normative implications of attaching political and partisan cues to polling questions were discussed.

Author Biographies

Gabriel Miao Li, University of Michigan

Gabriel Miao Li is a PhD candidate at the Department of Communication and Media at the University of Michigan. His research interests included public opinion expression and intergroup conflict.

Jack Lipei Tang, University of Southern California

Jack Lipei Tang is a PhD student at the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California. He is interested in areas of political communication, gender studies, and social media.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-10

Issue

Section

Articles