Digital Age| From Radical Transparency to Radical Disclosure: Reconfiguring (In)Voluntary Transparency Through the Management of Visibilities

Authors

  • Luke Heemsbergen University of Melbourne

Keywords:

, radical disclosure, radical transparency, visibility management, digital leaking, social shaming

Abstract

This article challenges how the concepts of voluntary and involuntary transparency are understood in the digital age by focusing on the management of involuntary and voluntary disclosure. We tend to understand radical transparency through new forms of involuntary networked data dissemination, spread without the consent or knowledge of whoever held the data. This view conflates the politics of exclusion with crucial questions of compulsion. At the same time, radical transparency’s promise to end secrecy has not materialized. Instead, the social-material relations underpinning digital disclosures suggest they function to reconfigure visibilities of control and recognition rather than reveal extant objects. Thus, the article introduces a typology of disclosure to better understand the involuntary and autonomous and inclusive and exclusionary dimensions of managing visibility in the digital era. It then explores two sets of empirical “radical disclosure” practices, made with purpose but without consent, to articulate how digital disclosures reconfigure visibility and set limits and opportunities in society. The article concludes with a suggestion toward ramifications for governance and autonomy.

Author Biography

Luke Heemsbergen, University of Melbourne

Luke Heemsbergen is a PhD candidate at the University of Melbourne researching how radical new forms of visibility shift expectations of democratic governing. He was recently a intern at Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society, is a founding member of Theiii.org,  and currently serves as a Chief Investigator on two grants covering the socio-political aspects of 3D Printing. His research has appeared in international academic journals and he has been invited to comment in broader publications including The New York Times.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2016-01-05

Issue

Section

Special Sections