Public Engagement, Propaganda, or Both? Attitudes Toward Politicians on Political Satire and Comedy Programs

Authors

  • Rebecca Higgie Brunel University London

Keywords:

satire, comedy, political communication, Barack Obama, Nick Clegg, Maxine McKew

Abstract

This article reports findings of a project that examined people’s attitudes toward politicians who participate in political satire and comedy programs. It surveyed 489 participants on their attitudes about satire’s political function and the politicians who play along or satirize themselves on those programs. The politicians’ own communication skills were found to be important, but the key to their success was also related to factors such as the format of the performance, the type of humor used, the status of the satire program in broader political discourse, and the role of the satirist as either facilitator or combatant. It was found that satire is a complex practice that can endorse as it criticizes and create sympathy as it ridicules.

Author Biography

Rebecca Higgie, Brunel University London

Dr Rebecca Higgie is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre for Comedy Studies Research at Brunel University London. Her research is funded by the Australian Government’s Endeavour Program. Her passion lies in the study of texts that envisage and engage with politics in unconventional and often mischievous ways. Note:My fellowship was funded by the Australian Government Endeavour Fellowships. My fellowship has recently finished and I have just returned to Australia. However, I am about to become an Associate with Brunel and am still working with Centre's Director, Sharon Lockyer. Given that I have just moved back to Australia though, and I am currently awaiting approval regarding my role as Associate, I have given my personal contact information.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles