A “Crisscrossing” Historical Analysis of <I>Four Theories of the Press</I>

Authors

  • Terhi Rantanen LSE

Keywords:

sociology-of-science approach (model), crisscrossing history, history of communication studies, comparative communication, press system, Wilbur Schramm, Theodore B. Peterson, Fredrick S. Siebert

Abstract

 Because 2016 was the 60th anniversary of the publication of Four Theories of the Press, it is time to reexplore how this book, labeled as “the bible of comparative media studies,” was born. This article applies a sociology-of-science approach, combined with histoire croisée (“crisscrossing history”), to analyze archival materials, published and unpublished (auto)biographies and previous academic research. It argues, after an analytical crisscrossing of individuals, research traditions, ideas, institutions, and their relationships that lie behind Four Theories, that the book was a compromise between the diverse interests of its authors, their backgrounds, ideas, and national and international politics, and thus an intersection of contradictory but also overlapping elements that also gave rise to new concepts of a press system and of a press theory in a transnational context.

Author Biography

Terhi Rantanen, LSE

Professor in Global Media and CommunicationsDirector of MSc in Global Media and CommunicationsRoom 7.01B, Tower 2, 7th floorThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceHoughton StreetWC2A 2AELondonTel. 442079556401

Downloads

Published

2017-09-14

Issue

Section

Articles