Identifying Normativity in Communication Research: A Typology and a Framework for Assessing Scientific and Extrascientific Norms

Authors

  • Liane Rothenberger Technische Universität Ilmenau
  • Claudia Auer
  • Cornelius B. Pratt Temple University

Keywords:

meta-analysis, normativity, norms, value-freedom, Werturteilsstreit

Abstract

Normativity in communication research is indicated in identifying a problem, a theory, or a methodology; in interpreting empirical data; and in acknowledging a scholar’s association or affiliation with a particular school of thought. However, scholars are often not aware of—or do not acknowledge—their normative assumptions, resulting in the exclusion of audiences from their arguments. This article, therefore, in arguing for an explication of norms in communication research, distinguishes among three levels of normativity, discusses the legitimacy of norms at those levels, and introduces a framework that enables scholars to reflect on their norms, an action that will help them to further compare, bridge, and synthesize different perspectives, theories, and methodologies in communication scholarship.

Author Biographies

Liane Rothenberger, Technische Universität Ilmenau

Dr. Liane RothenbergerInstitute of Media and Communication ScienceTechnische Universität Ilmenau, GermanyEhrenbergstr. 29D-98693 IlmenauEmail: liane.rothenberger@tu-ilmenau.dePhone: +49-3677-694669

Claudia Auer

Dr. Claudia Auer, M.A.Osterbachstr. 21D-59597 ErwitteEmail: claudiaauer@t-online.de

Cornelius B. Pratt, Temple University

Prof. Cornelius B. PrattKlein College of Media and CommunicationDepartment of Strategic and Organizational Communication Temple University, United States1701 North 13th Street Philadelphia, PA 19122 Email: cbpratt@temple.eduPhone: +1-215-204-3214

Downloads

Published

2019-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles